Quoting SpencerUnderground (spencer at autonomous.tv): > I reported last week we had a donor for some equiptment to install on > Moos Tower. Well, we still do. However, there is a hurdle that we must > overcome. Can you or someone from the Radio Club eloborate on why they wouldn't sign it? Since the TCWUG is just a group of people, who just share a common interest, who is going to sign on the dotted line? Is the group really ready and willing to accept the following points: Item 6 is a little draconian. If I read this right, something breaks, TCWUG would be responsible to fix it. Where does the money come from? Item 9 is another draconian measure. Hail storm comes through, TCWUG would be responsible for fixing/replacing the equipment. What is the value of the equipment? Item 10 requires more money. Item 14 isn't part of what is trying to be done here for personal, family and household purposes? I know I'd like to use it for personal usage. Personally, I would not sign this lease. Since TCWUG has no funds, I would not want to have to fork out the (personal) cash if any of the above lease items need to be invoked. -- Bob Tanner <tanner at real-time.com> | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500 http://www.tcwug.org, Minnesota, Wireless | Coding isn't a crime. Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288