On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:11:15PM -0600, Leif Utne wrote: > Thanks for that post. It echoes my sentiments exactly. The digital > divide is a harsh reality, and a classic example of a market failure > where government action, whether in the form of direct services or > incentives to the private sector, is absolutely appropriate. > > This is not about beating up on big bad evil corporations. No > corporation is inherently evil. But when bottom-line concerns trump the > public good, such as when telcos' or cable providers' monopolistic > practices actually stifle innovation and competition, government should > step in to make sure business plays fairly (and competitively) and > underserved communities get the services they deserve. The libertarians > among us should be more concerned about large corporations stifling > competition and innovation, which is what the Pennsylvania law does, > than they should about taxpayer dollars going to support greater > innovation and competition. Oh, I dunno... I read that and the first thought to my head is, "And where did the telcos and cable providers get their monopolies?" Is it a true market failure if the problems are caused by a government- granted monopoly? -- The freedoms that we enjoy presently are the most important victories of the White Hats over the past several millennia, and it is vitally important that we don't give them up now, only because we are frightened. - Eolake Stobblehouse (http://stobblehouse.com/text/battle.html)