On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:29:40AM -0500, Chuck Cole wrote: > > >I'm not trying to be negative or critical overall or I wouldn't be here. By >making some short and sharp comments, we have a good view of where opinions >really lie... much like giving a transient stimulus to an electronic >network, and that is a way to see the characteristics or its transfer >function. Maybe everyone else knew all this, but we don't have a FAQ to >explain whether we are going.. Developing a mission or basic definition of >an organization won't be easy if it's put to general vote. Perhaps that >means you and/or Realtime are the defacto responsible parties for now. >Whatever.. Whatever....????? If you are unhappy with the structure of the TCLUG that is your problem and I suggest you deal with it. I for one like the TCLUG and respect it for what it is. The software is freely (as in free b33r) available for you to start your own web/mail/whatever group. I don't think the TCLUG is looking for any sponsorship that requires any "special treatment". I thank Real-Time for all the time and effort and bandwidth they have so graciously provide this LUG over the years. I give respect to the RTE folks because they have made a positive contribution to the community without asking/mandating so called "special treatment". /me lets his tongue loose a tiny bit. > > >Regards, > >Chuck > > >_______________________________________________ >Twin Cities Linux Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota >http://www.mn-linux.org >tclug-list at mn-linux.org >https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- --*--SpencerUnderground--*-- http://autonomous.tv/ spencer at autonomous.tv Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2 68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020912/c344ed62/attachment.pgp