SpencerUnderground wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:28:11PM -0500, Chuck Cole wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org > > > >> If you are unhappy with the structure of the TCLUG that is > >> your problem > >> and I suggest you deal with it. I for one like the TCLUG and respect > >> it for what it is. > > > >I think you are missing the obvious. TCLUG has no statement of scope or > >being in legal terms, and that probably means that it's Bob's thing and his > >legal liability as well as his good works that help promote his business. I > >very much appreciate the efforts he and all others put in, and I'd rather > >not see him barbequed if some accident occurs. I'd like the group to grow > >and to include all sorts of interests. I'm just reacting to questions > >others have asked already. If TCLUG is an organization, then we need a > >statement of that. If Bob and RealTime are not responsible, then they > >probably need to take some action to establish that. I don't care what or > >when: I'm just identifying and asking about common things for public groups. > >These choices may limit what help I can provide. Let's not hide our heads > >in the sand. > > > >--- > >Chuck > Alright, let me pull my head out momentarily... > > You would like to see someone accountable for the actions of the TCLUG, > correct? Then you would be able to contribute further to this [dis] > Organization. OK. I understand your point of view. I simply > <strong>disagree</strong> with it. > > To have a single point of failure, er,uh, to have a responsible > person/entity be in control of the TCLUG would be against the morals of > why it has survived since inception. The point is not who is in charge, > the point is how can I help my peers. I truely don't believe you grasp > this concept. The priorities of the TCLUG are IMHO > Morals? > > 1) survival > 2) community support > 3) <whatever> > 4) see 1 > > If you would like to write up a nice FAQ and Rule list and Hierachy of > leaders and so on and so forth, please do. You can submit it to the > list for consensus. I wish you luck in your endeavors. > > I just wonder if Adolf Hilter would see the TCLUG as an admirable > adversary. hmmmmm. > > -- > --*--SpencerUnderground--*-- > http://autonomous.tv/ spencer at autonomous.tv > Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2 68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature Your statement is nice. However, how do you know it reflects the groups' feelings? --Nathan Davis