On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:58:49PM -0500, Nathan Davis wrote:
>SpencerUnderground wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:28:11PM -0500, Chuck Cole wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org
>> >
>> >> If you are unhappy with the structure of the TCLUG that is
>> >> your problem
>> >> and I suggest you deal with it.  I for one like the TCLUG and respect
>> >> it for what it is.
>> >
>> >I think you are missing the obvious.  TCLUG has no statement of scope or
>> >being in legal terms, and that probably means that it's Bob's thing and his
>> >legal liability as well as his good works that help promote his business.  I
>> >very much appreciate the efforts he and all others put in, and I'd rather
>> >not see him barbequed if some accident occurs.  I'd like the group to grow
>> >and to include all sorts of interests.  I'm just reacting to questions
>> >others have asked already.  If TCLUG is an organization, then we need a
>> >statement of that.  If Bob and RealTime are not responsible, then they
>> >probably need to take some action to establish that.  I don't care what or
>> >when: I'm just identifying and asking about common things for public groups.
>> >These choices may limit what help I can provide.  Let's not hide our heads
>> >in the sand.
>> >
>> >---
>> >Chuck
>> Alright, let me pull my head out momentarily...
>>
>> You would like to see someone accountable for the actions of the TCLUG,
>> correct?  Then you would be able to contribute further to this [dis]
>> Organization.  OK.  I understand your point of view.  I simply
>> <strong>disagree</strong> with it.
>>
>> To have a single point of failure, er,uh, to have a responsible
>> person/entity be in control of the TCLUG would be against the morals of
>> why it has survived since inception.  The point is not who is in charge,
>> the point is how can I help my peers.  I truely don't believe you grasp
>> this concept.  The priorities of the TCLUG are  IMHO
>>
>
>Morals?
>
>
>>
>> 1) survival
>> 2) community support
>> 3) <whatever>
>> 4) see 1
>>
>> If you would like to write up a nice FAQ and Rule list and Hierachy of
>> leaders and so on and so forth, please do.  You can submit it to the
>> list for consensus.  I wish you luck in your endeavors.
>>
>> I just wonder if Adolf Hilter would see the TCLUG as an admirable
>> adversary. hmmmmm.
>>
>> --
>>                         --*--SpencerUnderground--*--
>> http://autonomous.tv/                          spencer at autonomous.tv
>> Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2  68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754
>>
>>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
>
>Your statement is nice.  However, how do you know it reflects the groups'
>feelings?
"The priorities of the TCLUG are  IMHO"
IMHO == In my humble opinion.
>
>--Nathan Davis

-- 
                	--*--SpencerUnderground--*--
http://autonomous.tv/			       spencer at autonomous.tv
Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2  68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020912/4a4456f6/attachment.pgp