On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:58:49PM -0500, Nathan Davis wrote: >SpencerUnderground wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:28:11PM -0500, Chuck Cole wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: tclug-list-admin at mn-linux.org >> > >> >> If you are unhappy with the structure of the TCLUG that is >> >> your problem >> >> and I suggest you deal with it. I for one like the TCLUG and respect >> >> it for what it is. >> > >> >I think you are missing the obvious. TCLUG has no statement of scope or >> >being in legal terms, and that probably means that it's Bob's thing and his >> >legal liability as well as his good works that help promote his business. I >> >very much appreciate the efforts he and all others put in, and I'd rather >> >not see him barbequed if some accident occurs. I'd like the group to grow >> >and to include all sorts of interests. I'm just reacting to questions >> >others have asked already. If TCLUG is an organization, then we need a >> >statement of that. If Bob and RealTime are not responsible, then they >> >probably need to take some action to establish that. I don't care what or >> >when: I'm just identifying and asking about common things for public groups. >> >These choices may limit what help I can provide. Let's not hide our heads >> >in the sand. >> > >> >--- >> >Chuck >> Alright, let me pull my head out momentarily... >> >> You would like to see someone accountable for the actions of the TCLUG, >> correct? Then you would be able to contribute further to this [dis] >> Organization. OK. I understand your point of view. I simply >> <strong>disagree</strong> with it. >> >> To have a single point of failure, er,uh, to have a responsible >> person/entity be in control of the TCLUG would be against the morals of >> why it has survived since inception. The point is not who is in charge, >> the point is how can I help my peers. I truely don't believe you grasp >> this concept. The priorities of the TCLUG are IMHO >> > >Morals? > > >> >> 1) survival >> 2) community support >> 3) <whatever> >> 4) see 1 >> >> If you would like to write up a nice FAQ and Rule list and Hierachy of >> leaders and so on and so forth, please do. You can submit it to the >> list for consensus. I wish you luck in your endeavors. >> >> I just wonder if Adolf Hilter would see the TCLUG as an admirable >> adversary. hmmmmm. >> >> -- >> --*--SpencerUnderground--*-- >> http://autonomous.tv/ spencer at autonomous.tv >> Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2 68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature > >Your statement is nice. However, how do you know it reflects the groups' >feelings? "The priorities of the TCLUG are IMHO" IMHO == In my humble opinion. > >--Nathan Davis -- --*--SpencerUnderground--*-- http://autonomous.tv/ spencer at autonomous.tv Key fingerprint = 173B 8760 E59F DBF8 6FD2 68F8 ABA2 AB08 49C7 4754 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020912/4a4456f6/attachment.pgp